Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine in Michigan that allows an injured party to recover damages in an auto accident, even if they were partially at fault. Under this principle, the amount of compensation is reduced proportionately to the degree of the injured party’s negligence. For instance, if a driver is found 30% at fault in a rear-end collision, they can still pursue compensation for their injuries, but their damages will be reduced by 30%. Michigan’s no-fault insurance system also incorporates comparative negligence, impacting claims for certain economic losses like excess medical expenses. The Joseph Dedvukaj Firm’s skilled attorneys can navigate the complexities of comparative negligence, ensuring clients receive fair compensation despite potential allegations of contributory fault, whether in a hit-and-run, rollover accident, or case involving drunk driving.
Back to Glossary